In their report, Lal and Myers estimate it would cost about $800 million annually for five years to build and deploy a ...

Recently, acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy reportedly suggested a U.S. reactor would be operational on the moon by 2030.

Trying to get a nuclear reactor on the surface of the moon is going to take time – maybe much longer more than NASA wants.

A lunar nuclear reactor may sound dramatic, but its neither illegal nor unprecedented. But it does raise critical questions ...

Placing an atomic energy source on the lunar surface is “not science fiction,” experts say, but does pose technical ...

The Trump administration is pushing efforts to place a nuclear reactor on the moon to power a future human base. A newly ...

While nuclear reactors have been around on Earth for over 70 years, placing them on the moon would be unprecedented. NASA’s acting administrator, Sean Duffy, is aiming to do the undone: a reactor ...

The reactor would launch to the moon by 2030, according to a directive by Acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy that was sent ...

This is about space exploration. This is about this next phase,” Duffy, interim NASA administrator and ‘The Real World’ alum, ...

You have until Thursday August 21 to respond if you do NASA's plans to put a nuclear reactor on the Moon have moved on – the ...

NASA plans to establish a continuous lunar presence by 2030 with a nuclear reactor, crucial for powering habitats and ...